Manufaturando dissidência: performance e política em the Noam Chomsky Lectures Manufaturando dissidência: performance e política em the Noam Chomsky Lectures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este ensaio discute a peça The Noam Chomsky Lectures, escrita e encenada pelos atores canadenses Guillermo Verdecchia e Daniel Brooks. Concebida como um “workshop perpétuo”, a obra dos dois autores/atores, em forma de “palestra” sobre a obra do conhecido intelectual Noam Chomsky, aponta para o político enquanto necessidade do dia-a-dia, ou política como “performatividade”, e encena/ensina como resistir à “manufatura do consentimento”. Através de uma forma original de fazer teatro político, a dupla de atores/personagens desenvolve uma maneira alternativa de alertar a platéia para o bombardeio gradual e uniforme da informação, cujos conteúdos são filtrados e homogeneizados, em detrimento das políticas de diversidade do mundo atual, e desconstrói as “ilusões necessárias” do povo canadense, de não-cumplicidade com este modelo. Palavras-chaves: performance e mídia; teatro político; teatro didático; “manufatura do consentimento”; “ilusões necessárias”; EUA e Canadá; política externa. This essay discusses The Chomsky Lectures, written and performed by Guillermo Verdecchia and Daniel Brooks. Conceived as a “perpetual workshop”, and structured around “lectures” on Chomsky’s ideas, the play endeavors to point to the political as an everyday necessity, or to politics as performativity, acting out/teaching how to resist the manufacture of consent. Through this form of political theater, the Canadian duo develops an alternative way to alert the audience to the gradual and uniform bombardment of information, whose filtered and homogenized contents are detrimental do contemporary policies of diversity, at the same time that they deconstruct the Canadian citizens’ “necessary illusions” about their role vis-a-vis this model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.013 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".