MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322489156 · doi:10.2523/iptc-22825-ea

The TB 3.1 To TB 3.7 Sequence Stratigraphy and Structural Developments of the West Baram Delta Basin, Offshore Sarawak, East Malaysia

2023· article· en· W4322489156 on OpenAlexaff
Hasnol Hady Ismail, Chean Lin Lew, Sanatul Salwa Hasan, Muhd Rapi Mohamad Som, Mohd Fauzi Abdul Kadir, Mohamad Tajuddin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Petroleum Technology Conference · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies
Canadian institutionsQuest University Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyStructural basinDeltaPaleontologySequence stratigraphySedimentary rockSedimentary depositional environmentSequence (biology)Fault (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The West Baram Delta (WBD) basin is a structurally complex region with an abundance of hydrocarbon that has been produced and yet to be discovered. Within the basin, there is a drastic increase of sedimentary thickness occurred across the growth fault, contributed to major challenges for the sequence stratihgraphic framework correlation to be established throughout the basin. Understanding the growth fault development in terms of age-based within the region is critical for better accuracy in reservoir correlation, reservoir distribution and structural trap analyses. 3D seismic mega-merge of the West Baram Delta was used to interpret the third order Tejas B (TB) stratigraphic sequences. From the structure maps of the maximum flooding surfaces (MFS) and sequence boundary (SB), thickness maps were generated for the system tracts of the corresponding sequence, mainly the highstand and transgressive system tracts. Then, structural restoration using a method of layer back stripping and fault blocks shifting were conducted to study the depositional and structural evolution of the basin. The Late Miocene to Late Pliocene sequence and structural developments of the basin were mainly controlled by growth faulting activities are divided into seven stages: 1) WBD TB3.1 (~10.6Ma-~8.5Ma), 2) WBD TB3.2 (~8.5Ma-~6.7Ma), 3) WBD TB3.3 (~6.7Ma–~5.6Ma), 4) WBD TB3.4 (~ 5.6Ma-~4.2Ma), 5) WBD TB3.5 (~ 4.2Ma-~3.8Ma) 6) WBD TB3.6 (~3.8Ma-~3.0Ma) and 7) WBD TB3.7 (~3.0Ma-~1.9Ma) sequences. The high sediment supply rate is believed to provide conducive mechanisms for the gravity-induced syn-depositional growth faults to be initiated, which observed from WBD TB3.1 until WBD TB3.4. The growth faults in the basin were developed stage by stage from the south (landward) to the north (basinward) driven by the progradation of shoreface and delta sedimentation. The Northwest-Southeast wrench-induced compression which happened in Pliocene to Quaternary has caused basin inversion in the basin, where the trending of the fold axes is in the Northeast-Southwest orientation. The wrench-induced compression deformation was prominent at the proximal part of the basin, where its deformation extends distally down to the Baram field. The deformation developed the anticlinal features and faulting within this region. The intensity of the wrench-induced deformation decreases basinward, which is the reason why beyond the Baronia field, the deformation is less prominent. The distal part of the basin is mainly controlled by the gravity-induced syn-depositional growth faults tectonic style since the wrenching is not prominent. The seven third-order depositional sequences established as WBD TB3.1 to WBD TB3.7 sequences with a complex growth-faulted structure development in the West Baram Delta give a new insight of understanding the depositional and structural evolution through time which may lead to a better stratigraphic correlation and hydrocarbon trap analyses at the field scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Petroleum Technology ConferenceSame topicGeological and Geophysical StudiesFrench-language works237,207