MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322490317 · doi:10.1007/s40948-023-00537-z

Interaction of natural and hydraulic fractures: the impact on reservoir pressure buildup and risk of shear fault reactivation in the Upper Devonian Duvernay Formation, Fox Creek, Alberta

2023· article· en· W4322490317 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Qiuguo Li, Elena Konstantinovskaya, Alexey Zhmodik, Charles Ibelegbu

Bibliographic record

VenueGeomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsARC Resources (Canada)General Dynamics (Canada)University of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsGeologyHydraulic fracturingMicroseismInduced seismicityFluid pressureFault (geology)Fluid dynamicsShear (geology)PetrologySeismologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: The interaction of natural and hydraulic fractures may facilitate lateral fluid propagation in an unconventional reservoir resulting in fast fluid pressure transmission from treatment wells to a fault zone and potential fault shear slip reactivation and associated induced seismicity. Several induced earthquakes (up to 4.1 Mw) occurred since 2013 during hydraulic fracturing of the Upper Devonian Duvernay Formation in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. The mechanism of lateral fluid migration in the unconventional reservoir is not well understood. The current study aims to investigate the interaction of natural fractures and hydraulic fractures for the case study in the area south of Fox Creek, where a linear zone of induced earthquakes (up to 3.9 Mw) occurred along a fault in 2015 during hydraulic fracturing of horizontal wells. We analyze the growth of hydraulic fractures in presence of natural fractures, the impact of resulting complex fracture network on fluid transmission and fluid pressure buildup around the treatment wells. Hydraulic fracture modeling (HFM), reservoir simulations and 3D coupled reservoir-geomechanical modeling are applied to match the timing of hydraulic fracture propagation and transmitted fluid pressure increase in the fault zone versus induced earthquake occurrence. HFM results are verified by microseismic clouds distribution. Reservoir simulations are validated by a history matching of fluid injection volume and bottomhole pressure data. Additional HFM simulations are carried out to optimize the pumping schedule in the studied well pad that would help to prevent hydraulic fractures reaching the fault and minimize the risk of induced seismicity. Article highlights: Stress anisotropy and simulated natural fractures impact lateral growth of complex hydraulic fractures and reservoir pressure buildup.Predicted fluid pressure transmission to a fault zone results in fault dextral shear slip reactivation matching induced seismicity.Optimized pumping schedule helps to minimize risks of fault reactivation and induced seismicity while preserving overall pad performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-ResourcesSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207