THE EFFECT OF STRENGTHENING EXERCISE ON THE QUADRICEPT AND HAMSTRING MUSCLES ON CHANGING FUNCTIONAL KNEES FOR PATIENTS WITH KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Osteoarthritis is a failure to repair damage in the joints caused by excessive mechanical stress. This disease is chronic, degenerative, non-inflammatory, and slowly progressive, one of which is characterized by decreased function. Osteoarthritis is a form of osteoarthritis that affects people in old age or adulthood. The cause of osteoarthritis is not known with certainty, but age, gender, race, genetics, obesity, and physical activity are risk factors that lead to pathological changes and affect the decreased functional ability. This decrease in functional ability in osteoarthritis can be overcome by isometric exercise.Methods: The research design used was a pre-experimental design with an approach of pretest-posttest one group design. The sampling technique used was total sampling, with a total of 20 respondents aged 40–70 years. Exercise with a frequency of 2 times a week for 8 weeks at an intensity of 3 repetitions for 15 minutes. The measuring instrument in this study used WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index). Normality test using the Shapiro-Wilk test, hypothesis testing using the Wilcoxon Test.The results showed the level of functional ability before being given the intervention had an average value of 2.30 and after being given the intervention had an average value of 1.40. Statistical test results showed p-value = 0.000 (p 0.005). This shows that there is an effect of isometric exercise on changes in functional abilities of patients with Samarinda knee osteoarthritis at AW Sjahranie Hospital.Conclusion: Giving isometric exercise to the quadriceps and hamstrings has an effect on improving the functional ability of the knee in patients with osteoarthritis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".