Study to Compare the Efficacy of Three Oxytetracycline Regimens for the Treatment of Anaplasma Marginale Carrier Status in Beef Cattle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anaplasmosis is a blood-borne disease of cattle and other ruminants caused by Anaplasma marginale. Animals recovering from clinical anaplasmosis and those treated with therapeutic doses of oxytetracycline remain persistently infected with microscopically undetectable levels of the organism. These animals serve as reservoirs of the disease which can be spread mechanically or through arthropod vectors. Tetracyclines are the only compounds approved for treatment of acute anaplasmosis infections in the United States; however no compounds are approved for eliminating the carrier state. This has contributed to the restricted movement of cattle from endemic areas of the US to anaplasmosis-free territories such as Canada. Anaplasmosis is estimated to cost the US cattle industry $100 million per year, with some estimating the cost of resticted trade to be near $300 million annually. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of three oxytetracycline treatment regimens on eliminating Anaplasma marginale infection from carrier beef steers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".