MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322578867 · doi:10.1017/9781782042785.001

Loyalism and the British World: Overviews, Themes and Linkages

2014· other· en· W4322578867 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Frank O’Gorman, Allan Blackstock

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommonwealthBritishnessDevolution (biology)PoliticsContext (archaeology)National identityIdentity (music)Political scienceGender studiesSociologyPolitical economyHistoryLawAnthropologyArchaeologyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the early twenty-first century, the issue of national identity remains a principal matter of concern not only to academic historians in Britain and the Commonwealth but also, with political Devolution, in the wider context of UK identity politics. This is the case whether it arises in the guise of debates about Britishness, in the re-fashioning of Britain itself in the context of the devolved institutions in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland or in the continuing problems of Britain’s relationship with Europe. At the same time, passionate debates occur in Commonwealth countries about identity, involving not only their relationship with Britain but also, as in Australia, New Zealand and Canada, difficult and complex relationships with other races. How rapidly changing national identities are defined and treated in the Commonwealth seems to be just as problematic as it is in Britain. It is to the role of loyalism in the formation and early development of these identities that this volume is addressed. In the eighteenth century Britain was a complex political entity and one which enjoyed the monarchical, aristocratic and ecclesiastical trappings of an ancien regime . From its political traditions and precedents what we call ‘loyalism’ emerged within Britain and Ireland and was transmitted to the empire overseas. Loyalism was once thought of by historians as a simplistic, almost instinctive, conservative reaction to internal political change or external military threat. However, recent historiography in Britain, Ireland and the British Atlantic, has treated loyalism as much more complex, fluid and multi-faceted. Indeed loyalism, as now seen, was something which reformers as well as conservatives embraced, involving participation ranging from Irish Orangemen and English Church and King fanatics to Irish and Canadian Catholics, native Americans and Canadian reformers. Loyalism therefore was not a single or static entity, either in the British and Irish islands or in the British world, but a dynamic phenomenon with several distinct strands interwoven with the equally diverse ideological position we call patriotism. The focus of the volume is upon the role of loyalism in promoting and mobilising sentiments of national identity in Britain and Ireland and in the rapidly expanding empire between the seventeenth and the nineteenth centuries. These essays offer several important re-evaluations of loyalism. First, they offer a fresh teleology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.014
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicScottish History and National IdentityFrench-language works237,207