Loyalism and the British World: Overviews, Themes and Linkages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the early twenty-first century, the issue of national identity remains a principal matter of concern not only to academic historians in Britain and the Commonwealth but also, with political Devolution, in the wider context of UK identity politics. This is the case whether it arises in the guise of debates about Britishness, in the re-fashioning of Britain itself in the context of the devolved institutions in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland or in the continuing problems of Britain’s relationship with Europe. At the same time, passionate debates occur in Commonwealth countries about identity, involving not only their relationship with Britain but also, as in Australia, New Zealand and Canada, difficult and complex relationships with other races. How rapidly changing national identities are defined and treated in the Commonwealth seems to be just as problematic as it is in Britain. It is to the role of loyalism in the formation and early development of these identities that this volume is addressed. In the eighteenth century Britain was a complex political entity and one which enjoyed the monarchical, aristocratic and ecclesiastical trappings of an ancien regime . From its political traditions and precedents what we call ‘loyalism’ emerged within Britain and Ireland and was transmitted to the empire overseas. Loyalism was once thought of by historians as a simplistic, almost instinctive, conservative reaction to internal political change or external military threat. However, recent historiography in Britain, Ireland and the British Atlantic, has treated loyalism as much more complex, fluid and multi-faceted. Indeed loyalism, as now seen, was something which reformers as well as conservatives embraced, involving participation ranging from Irish Orangemen and English Church and King fanatics to Irish and Canadian Catholics, native Americans and Canadian reformers. Loyalism therefore was not a single or static entity, either in the British and Irish islands or in the British world, but a dynamic phenomenon with several distinct strands interwoven with the equally diverse ideological position we call patriotism. The focus of the volume is upon the role of loyalism in promoting and mobilising sentiments of national identity in Britain and Ireland and in the rapidly expanding empire between the seventeenth and the nineteenth centuries. These essays offer several important re-evaluations of loyalism. First, they offer a fresh teleology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".