THE EFFECTS OF DNASE I AND LOW-MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN IN A MURINE MODEL OF POLYMICROBIAL ABDOMINAL SEPSIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Introduction: Cell-free DNA (CFDNA) has emerged as a prognostic biomarker in patients with sepsis. Circulating CFDNA is hypothesized to be associated with histones in the form of nucleosomes. In vitro, DNA activates coagulation and inhibits fibrinolysis, whereas histones activate platelets and are cytotoxic to endothelial cells. Previous studies have targeted CFDNA or histones in animal models of sepsis using DNase I or heparins, respectively, which has reduced inflammatory and thrombosis markers, thereby improving survival. In this study, we explored the possibility that the combination of DNase I and a low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) may be a better therapeutic approach than monotherapy in a murine model of abdominal sepsis. Methods: C57Bl/6 mice (8-12 weeks old, both sexes) were subjected to either cecal ligation and puncture or sham surgery. Mice were given antibiotics, fluids, and either saline, DNase I (intraperitoneally, 20 mg/kg/8 h), LMWH (dalteparin, subcutaneously 500 IU/kg/12 h), or a combination of both (n = 12-31). Mice were monitored over 72 h for survival. Organs and blood were harvested for analysis. Levels of LMWH, CFDNA, IL-6, citrullinated histone-H3, thrombin-antithrombin complexes, and protein C were measured in plasma. Results: Administration of either DNase I (81.8%) or LMWH (83.3%, prophylactic range of 0.12 ± 0.07 IU/mL achieved) improved the survival of septic mice compared with saline- (38.7%) and combination-treated mice (48.8%, P < 0.05). Combination-treated mice also showed a small but insignificant improvement in survival compared with saline-treated cecal ligation and puncture mice. Monotherapies may be improving survival by reducing blood bacterial loads, citrullinated histone-H3, and thrombin-antithrombin complexes, and improving protein C levels. Conclusions: Compared with saline- and combination-treated mice, administration of monotherapies to septic mice improved survival. These findings suggest that there may be a negative drug-drug interaction between DNase I and LMWH when DNase I is administered intraperitoneally in a murine model of polymicrobial abdominal sepsis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".