MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322619256 · doi:10.3897/folmed.65.e68278

Association between pain, arthropathy and health-related quality of life in patients suffering from acromegaly. A cross-sectional study

2023· article· en· W4322619256 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Angelo Alito, Giorgio Carmelo Basile, Daniele Bruschetta, Gina Lacramioara Berescu, Filippo Cavallaro, Aurelio Daniele Postorino, Eliseo Scarcella, Marta Ragonese, Salvatore Cannavò, Adriana Tisano

Bibliographic record

VenueFolia Medica · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineWOMACCross-sectional studyAcromegalyQuality of life (healthcare)Physical therapyInternal medicineOutpatient clinicDiseaseOsteoarthritisAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Despite successful therapy, acromegalic patients have reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to healthy controls. Finding predictors of poor HRQoL can be crucial to improving these patients' global health state. Aim: The primary objective of the study was to find out predictors of HRQoL. Secondary objectives were: (I) to determine correlations with AcroQoL subscales, and (II) to identify predictors for subscales. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study conducted in 2019 at the Messina Policlinic Hospital, 45 acromegalic patients were assessed at the Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine Ambulatory. During routine outpatient clinic attendances, the following questionnaires were administered: Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire (AcroQoL), Patient-Assessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). We furthermore included the following variables obtained by medical record review: age, BMI, disease duration, previous surgery (Yes/No), previous radiotherapy (Yes/No), use of GH lowering medications (Yes/No), hypertension (Yes/No), diabetes mellitus (Yes/No), and biochemical control of the disease (Yes/No): immunoradiometric assays were employed to serum GH and IGF-1 measurements to identify biochemical control of the disease. Correlation between outcome measures and AcroQoL has been performed. Pearson's r was calculated for continuous data following normal distribution (AcroQoL, PASQ, AcroQoL-B, AcroQoL-R, WOMAC-P), while Spearman's rank order correlation was calculated for non-normally distributed data (WOMAC, WOMAC-F, WOMAC-S, AcroQoL-P) and point-biserial correlation for binary variables (biochemically controlled disease, use of GH lowering medications, radiotherapy, surgery). The same correlation analysis was performed for the AcroQoL subscales. Multiple linear regression with backwards, stepwise analysis was used to assess the influence on AcroQoL of correlated variables. RESULTS: AcroQoL was strongly negatively correlated with PASQ (r=-0.700, p<0.001) and negatively correlated with WOMAC [rs (43)=-0.530, p<0.001] and among WOMAC subscales with WOMAC-Physical fitness [rs (43)=-0.518, p<0.001] WOMAC-Pain [r (43)=-0.428, p=0.003], WOMAC-Stiffness [rs (43)=-0.393, p=0.007], and radiotherapy [r (43) =-0.314, p=0.035]. After univariate stepwise regression, PASQ was the strongest independent predictor of AcroQoL, with R2 of 0.392 [F (1,43)=27.695, p<0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the severity of painful symptoms is the most important predictor of HRQoL in patients with acromegaly; at the same time, acromegalic arthropathy leads to pain and to a variable amount of functional impairment, exerting great impact on the patient's perception of his health status. Measure of the progression of arthropathy and symptomatic management could lead to a great HRQoL benefit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFolia MedicaSame topicPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207