Decreasing the aggregation and ligand redox potential of metallophthalocyanines through branched ether functionalization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The addition of ether functional groups to a metallophthalocyanine ring is known to significantly decrease the oxidation potentials of the ring. In this light, the impact of the branching of alkyl-ether groups on the electronic properties was investigated via the synthesis of non-peripheral ([Formula: see text]-substituted n-butyl (1), iso-butyl (2) and sec-butyl (3) 1,4,8,11,15,18,22,25-octabutoxyphthalocyanines, in conjunction with Co and Cu metal centers. From 1 to 3 the first and second ring-based oxidation potentials were decreased by 70 mV and 110 mV respectively both for Cu and Co-containing complexes; the UV-visible Q-band maxima only changed by 4-8 nm, consistent with the destabilization of both the HOMO and LUMO, as confirmed by TD-DFT calculations. The reversibility of both redox couples was improved via branching (3) for the Co complexes. All six complexes were structurally characterized, with varying levels and types of ring distortions. All molecules show 1-D supramolecular stacking, but for n-butoxy 1Co an intermolecular Co-O interaction aligns the molecular stacks, while for sec-butoxy 3Co only [Formula: see text]-[Formula: see text] stacking of the Pc-ring was present. Both 3Co and 3Cu were ring-oxidized at lower potentials than 1Co and 1Cu, and the increased steric bulk from the branched ether chains prevented the overlap of their N8C8 inner rings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".