MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4322622742 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000207239

Bilingualism, Epilepsy, and Connectome Resilience

2023· letter· en· W4322622742 on OpenAlexafffund
Jessica Royer, Boris C. Bernhardt

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2023
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsEpilepsyTemporal lobeNeuroscienceHippocampal sclerosisConnectomePsychologyNeuropsychologyCognitionMedicineFunctional connectivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epilepsy is among the most prevalent neurologic disorders worldwide, and one-third of patients continue to experience seizures despite medical therapy. Many of these pharmacoresistant patients suffer from temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). High-resolution MRI has been instrumental to diagnose mesiotemporal sclerosis, the hallmark pathology of TLE, and for mapping distributed substrates of the condition.1 These methods have shaped our understanding of TLE as a network disorder, highlighting how structural changes and brain rewiring beyond the mesiotemporal disease epicenter may affect network signaling. This perspective has granted a powerful framework to study seizure mechanisms and to better understand the unique phenotype of TLE. Indeed, TLE is more than a seizure disorder: Over 50% of patients present with clinically significant neuropsychological impairment,2 with degrees of dysfunction generally mirroring the extent of network compromise.3 Given how cognitive impairment often affects patient functioning, quality of life, and well-being,4 there is a pressing need to identify factors able to mitigate atypical brain network organization in TLE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology→Same topicEpilepsy research and treatment→French-language works237,207→