Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objet de cet article est d’investir l’axe 1 du présent dossier, autrement dit de poser la question du modèle philosophique d’éducation du citoyen auquel il s’agit de se référer aujourd’hui pour les questions scolaires. Soucieux de proposer à la discussion une conception démocratique, individualiste et libérale de la citoyenneté comme de l’école contemporaine - en contrepoint des conceptions néo-républicaines de ces mêmes enjeux - nous proposons pour ce faire un dialogue critique, du point de vue de la philosophie politique de l’éducation, avec l’oeuvre de Dominique Schnapper. Nous commençons par dégager, exposer et articuler les principales lignes de force de son modèle de citoyenneté et de ses implications en termes d’éducation citoyenne et de philosophie politique de l’école (1), puis le confrontons à deux critiques d’inspiration libérale, du républicanisme scolaire (2), avant de faire valoir pour finir l’intérêt d’une perspective néo-tocquevillienne et minimaliste de l’éducation citoyenne dans une société des individus (3).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".