MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322631280 · doi:10.5348/100139z08jw2023cr

Spontaneous dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy following a leuprolide acetate trigger and freeze all cycle for OHSS risk: A case report

2023· article· en· W4322631280 on OpenAlexaff
Justin S. White, Jenna Gale, Aaron Jackson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Case Reports and Images in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian function and disorders
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalOttawa Fertility CentreUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvarian hyperstimulation syndromeIn vitro fertilisationMedicineGynecologyPregnancyInfertilityObstetricsAgonistInternal medicineBiologyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist triggers are increasingly used in antagonist in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) following a robust ovarian response. The luteolytic effects of GnRH agonists inhibit implantation or spontaneous pregnancy, warranting freezing available blastocysts for future transfer after the risk of OHSS subsides. Case Report: A 33-year-old G1P1 with secondary infertility due to polycystic ovarian syndrome underwent IVF with a GnRH antagonist cycle. A leuprolide acetate trigger for final oocyte maturation was prescribed given her risk of OHSS. A spontaneous dichorionic/diamniotic twin pregnancy ensued. Conclusion: This case reinforces the importance of advising abstinence during the stimulation phase of an IVF cycle and that, although rare, the endometrium may allow for spontaneous conception following a leuprolide acetate trigger, which may further potentiate the risk of late OHSS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Case Reports and Images in Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicOvarian function and disordersFrench-language works237,207