Detailed Biophysical Characterization of the Acid-Induced PrP<sup>c</sup> to PrP<sup>β</sup> Conversion Process
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prions are believed to spontaneously convert from a native, monomeric highly helical form (called PrP(c)) to a largely β-sheet-rich, multimeric and insoluble aggregate (called PrP(sc)). Because of its large size and insolubility, biophysical characterization of PrP(sc) has been difficult, and there are several contradictory or incomplete models of the PrP(sc) structure. A β-sheet-rich, soluble intermediate, called PrP(β), exhibits many of the same features as PrP(sc) and can be generated using a combination of low pH and/or mild denaturing conditions. Studies of the PrP(c) to PrP(β) conversion process and of PrP(β) folding intermediates may provide insights into the structure of PrP(sc). Using a truncated, recombinant version of Syrian hamster PrP(β) (shPrP(90-232)), we used NMR spectroscopy, in combination with other biophysical techniques (circular dichroism, dynamic light scattering, electron microscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and proteinase K digestion), to characterize the pH-driven PrP(c) to PrP(β) conversion process in detail. Our results show that below pH 2.8 the protein oligomerizes and conversion to the β-rich structure is initiated. At pH 1.7 and above, the oligomeric protein can recover its native monomeric state through dialysis to pH 5.2. However, when conversion is completed at pH 1.0, the large oligomer "locks down" irreversibly into a stable, β-rich form. At pH values above 3.0, the protein is amenable to NMR investigation. Chemical shift perturbations, NOE, amide line width, and T(2) measurements implicate the putative "amylome motif" region, "NNQNNF" as the region most involved in the initial helix-to-β conversion phase. We also found that acid-induced PrP(β) oligomers could be converted to fibrils without the use of chaotropic denaturants. The latter finding represents one of the first examples wherein physiologically accessible conditions (i.e., only low pH) were used to achieve PrP conversion and fibril formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".