MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322705598 · doi:10.1525/gfc.2023.23.1.5

Theorizing Authenticity

2023· article· en· W4322705598 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lauren Crossland-Marr, Elizabeth L. Krause

Bibliographic record

VenueGastronomica The Journal of Food and Culture · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCulinary Culture and Tourism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyEpistemologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction to the Special Section''theorizing authenticity'' contributes to understanding the proliferation of authenticity in popular cultural and market arenas, a phenomenon reflected in the quantity and value of craft and heritage foods globally.The special section provides a place to explore how producers fashion authenticity through creative labor.The four articles in this section focus on the figure of the Italian artisanal producer 1 and as such explore how individuals create value in global capitalist markets through the practices they perform to produce food as well as the stories they tell about their skill, creativity, and geography.The figure also allows the authors to remain cognizant that wielding authenticity is not an equally distributed possibility in today's societies.Such privilege is rarely afforded to the innovators or to immigrant communities-the kabob maker in Perugia, Italy, can never be ''authentic'' (Nowak 2012).Those of us studying, writing, and thinking about food find authenticity suspect at best, but it persists-even through a pandemicand food seems to be its most noble vehicle.In this special section, we confront authenticity head on while remaining skeptical of the impulse to attach simple good versus bad moral values to authenticity narratives.This special section comes out of a panel we originally organized for the 2020 American Anthropological Association (AAA) meetings, scheduled in St. Louis, where the first author was resident and the co-author was born, but the meetings were canceled due to COVID-19.The panel finally came to fruition in November 2021 in Baltimore.Like everyone else, we had been changed over a year and a half of isolation and separation.Separation not just from our panel, but from our research sites, from our in-person classes, from our rituals of commensality.While this separation was difficult and painful, it also expanded our interest in, and exploration of, authenticity in life in general and food in particular.During the lockdown, debates about the authenticity of foods amplified, especially for those of us who maintained our livelihoods during the economic instability of COVID-19.And it was in the context of instability that nostalgia and authenticity came together in tense ways through food.As food writer Tanushree Bhowmik explained, ''What came along with the deluge of traditional food was the debate on authenticity'' (Bhowmik 2020).This debate coincided with the pandemic affecting Italians especially hard early on, transforming spaces of authenticity into geographies of crisis.Even before the pandemic, Italians were engaging in discourse about foods, marketing local foodways as authentic.Given the market share of Italian craft food, Italian politicians were also adamant that a simple definition of authenticity exists and can be attached to foods; take, for example, the mayor of the city of Bologna, which is located in central Italy.In 2019, he went to Twitter to ask Italian citizens living abroad a favor.''Dear citizens, I'm collecting photos of spaghetti alla bolognese in circulation across the globe as a type of fake news . . .Send me yours'' (Castrodale and Pollack 2019).According to the mayor, spaghetti bolognese did not exist in Italy.He made this claim even though writers such as Bologna native Piero Valdiserra have explained that the people of Bologna have consumed dried pasta for hundreds of years and probably even put ragu `on it (Kirchgaessner 2016).The authors in this special section, who all research foodways in Italy, would probably scream: ''But spaghetti bolognese does exist!''-atleast in places like the United States, Canada, Argentina, and the United Kingdom.At the same time, most of us who work in Italy on food often talk about authenticity with our families and friends (Parasecoli 2017: 8).We are bombarded with questions about the authentic dishes we consumed while living in Italy.As scholars of culture first, we learned quickly what people didn't want to hear: what we actually ate in Italy.We rarely brought up the Chinese hot pot, the Japanese sushi, or the halal hamburgers.It's a curious thing: they wanted authenticity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.096
Scholarly communication0.0140.026
Open science0.0030.012
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGastronomica The Journal of Food and CultureSame topicCulinary Culture and TourismFrench-language works237,207