Longitudinal Study on the Impact of COVID-19 on the SI Community in Portugal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A pandemia do vírus SARS-CoV-2 causador da COVID-19 teve um impacto à escala mundial e ditou uma mudança disruptiva no quotidiano de milhões de pessoas.O encerramento das escolas e de centros de investigação obrigou a uma mudança complexa para um modelo de ensino e trabalho à distância em que Professores, Investigadores e Estudantes tiveram que se adaptar rapidamente.Este estudo teve como objetivo conhecer os impactos da COVID-19 no Ensino e Investigação na comunidade APSI -Associação Portuguesa de Sistemas de Informação.Para tal, foi disponibilizado um questionário online criado pela AIS -Association for Information Systems, na comunidade APSI, e posteriormente desenvolvidos workshops para aprofundar o conhecimento das limitações que a pandemia trouxe para o quotidiano dos associados.Os resultados deste estudo traçam um cenário negativo, onde os inquiridos apontam para um aumento da carga de trabalho, uma diminuição da produtividade científica e um impacto negativo na relação com a família.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".