MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322706751 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2023.3247695

A 3-D-Printed Portable EMG Wristband for the Quantitative Detection of Finger Motion

2023· article· en· W4322706751 on OpenAlexafffund
Haotian Su, Tae‐Ho Kim, Hadi Moeinnia, Woo Soo Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSIGNAL (programming language)Printed circuit boardElectrodeSignal processingBiomedical engineeringElectromyographyMaterials scienceAcousticsComputer scienceComputer hardwareElectrical engineeringEngineeringDigital signal processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is highly required to develop an affordable surface electromyography (EMG) wristband for the improved control of prostheses that is suitable to mimic human hand functions. By using the 3-D-printing technology, the wristband is customizable and feasible for various arm sizes or shapes. In this article, we have developed the 3-D-printed wristband for the control application. It consists of five pairs of custom-made serpentine dry electrodes, one EMG sensor, and one signal processing printed circuit board (PCB) to detect the user’s finger movements simultaneously. The wristband demonstrated its stability in EMG signal processing with a single-sensor system, which differed from other multisensor system devices. We verified the stability of the serpentine electrodes as bendable and stretchable. The serpentine electrodes have improved signal detection by providing conformal contact to the skin surface compared with the existing rigid dry electrodes. The flexibility allowed the electrodes to be placed in any shape of the skin surface. In a series of tests performed by the volunteer, we showed that the collected EMG signals reflected the muscle movements through signal processing. Under the muscle contraction of 75 lb, the wristband showed a signal sensitivity of 0.556 mV/lb with a 27-dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for its valid EMG sensing capability. In addition, we also demonstrated the relationship between signal intensities and muscle forces at the different levels quantitatively. This work shows promising potential toward the advanced control system of prosthetic fields and its corresponding market.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.220

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207