MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322714155 · doi:10.5331/seppyo.78.6_425

Dynamics ofsurge-type glaciers in Alaska-Yukon revealed by Synthetic Aperture Radar

2016· article· en· W4322714155 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Takahiro Abe, Masato Furuya

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Japanese Society of Snow and Ice · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynthetic aperture radarGeologyGlacierRemote sensingInterferometric synthetic aperture radarRadarInverse synthetic aperture radarRadar imagingGeodesyGeomorphologyComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

氷河サージとは,長い静穏期の後に流動速度が平時の数倍から数百倍にまで短期的に上昇する現象で,末端の前進や高度変化を伴う.サージ型氷河は世界的には数少なく,低頻度な現象であるため,その動態には解明されていないことが多かった.しかし,合成開口レーダー(Synthetic Aperture Radar, SAR)を用いた氷河流動観測が質・量ともに向上し,新たな知見が得られつつある.本稿では,非サージ型氷河の理解にも重要な氷河表面速度と氷河の水理・水文環境の変動を概観するとともに,これまで提起されたサージ発生メカニズムとその問題点を解説する.次に,SARによる氷河流動観測技術の進展と最近のサージ検出事例を紹介し,サージ発生メカニズムに関する最新の知見を議論する.最後に,衛星SARによる今後の氷河流動観測について述べる.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Japanese Society of Snow and IceSame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207