Rotational Dynamics of Discoid Colloidal Particles in Attractive Quasi-Two-Dimensional Plastic Crystals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plastic crystals formed from anisotropic molecules or particles are an important state of matter characterized by the presence of long-range positional order and the lack of long-range orientational order. The rotational motion of molecules or particles in plastic crystals is the most attractive characteristic of the system. Here the rotational dynamics of the discoid particles in quasi-two-dimensional colloidal plastic crystals stabilized via depletion interactions are quantitatively studied using time-resolved confocal microscopy. The measured probability distribution of particle orientation reveals the existence of a strong coupling between the lattice symmetry and particle rotation, resulting in anisotropic rotational dynamics modes resembling the underlying hexagonal crystalline symmetry. Furthermore, the orientational distribution function provides information about the potential surface of rotational dynamics. The observed slow rotational diffusion can be attributed to the presence of orientational minima and potential barriers on the potential surface. Our findings with a real experimental system provide important insights into the role of attraction in the phase behaviors of plastic crystals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".