The nonalcoholic fatty liver risk in prediction of unfavorable outcome after stroke: A nationwide registry analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Few researches have looked at the relationship between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) at the time of admission and the long-term outcomes of patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We aimed to probe the relationship between NAFLD risk evaluated by NAFLD indices and long-term endpoints, along with the prognostic value of merging NAFLD indices with established risk markers for the prognosis of AIS patients. The fatty liver index (FLI) and the Hepatic steatosis index (HSI) were used to evaluate NAFLD risk in the Third China National Stroke Registry (CNSR-III), a large, prospective, national, multicenter cohort registry study. NAFLD was defined as FLI ≥35 for males and FLI ≥ 20 for females, as well as HSI>36. Death or major disability (modified Rankin Scale score ≥3) were the primary outcomes following the beginning of a stroke. On patient outcomes, the prognostic performance of two objective NAFLD parameters was evaluated. NAFLD was detected in 32.10-51.90% of AIS patients. After 1-year, 14.5% of the participants had died or suffered a severe outcome. After controlling for known risk factors, NAFLD was associated with a modest probability of adverse outcome (odds ratio,0.72[95% CI, 0.61-0.86] for FLI; odds ratio,0.68[95% CI, 0.55-0.85] for HSI). The inclusion of the two NAFLD indicators in the conventional prediction model was justified by the integrated discrimination index, continuing to increase the model's overall predictive value for long-term adverse outcomes. NAFLD risk was linked to a lower risk of long-term death or major disability in people with AIS. The predictive value of objective NAFLD after AIS was demonstrated in our study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".