MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322726615 · doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2022.12.011

Effect of Training on Vascular Function and Repair in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

2023· article· en· W4322726615 on OpenAlexaff
Andreas B. Gevaert, Birgit Böhm, H Hartmann, Inge Goovaerts, Tibor Stoop, Caroline M. Van De Heyning, Paul Beckers, Flavia Baldassarri, Stephan Mueller, Renate Oberhoffer, André Duvinage, Mark J. Haykowsky, Ulrik Wisløff, Volker Adams, Burkert Pieske, Martin Halle, Emeline M. Van Craenenbroeck

Bibliographic record

VenueJACC Heart Failure · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersTechnische Universität MünchenFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekFP7 HealthUniversitair Ziekenhuis AntwerpenDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyHeart failureInternal medicineHeart failure with preserved ejection fractionEjection fractionAerobic exercisePeripheralEndotheliumInterval trainingProgenitor cellStem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score0.557

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJACC Heart FailureSame topicCardiovascular and exercise physiologyFrench-language works237,207