MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322730151 · doi:10.1017/9781846159794.003

Introduction: The Social and Economic Background

2010· other· en· W4322730151 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Economic history of UK and US
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemolitionQuarter (Canadian coin)NewspaperHistoryArchitectureAmerican westArchaeologyGeographyEconomic historyPolitical scienceLawEthnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

‘ANOTHER BIG HOUSE DOOMED’ – thus, in March 1957, the Suffolk Chronicle & Mercury announced the prospective demolition of one of Suffolk's large country houses, Branches Park, in the west of the county. This was not the first such report that the newspapers had carried, nor was it to be the last. From the end of the Great War through until the last quarter of the twentieth century large houses continued to be demolished, and it was not until changes in planning law and the development of new uses for large properties stemmed the flow of destruction that the considerable damage which had been done to the county's historical, architectural and artistic heritage came to an end. That damage, which occurred right across the country, was graphically portrayed in 1974 in an exhibition at the Victoria and Albert Museum and in the accompanying book The Destruction of the Country House. The book listed some 700 houses in England which had been pulled down or destroyed by fire and contained illustrations of nearly two hundred of them. Through the exhibition and the book the extent of the catastrophe that had occurred was brought to public attention. Not all the houses were of great architectural merit nor were their contents of particular distinction. However, many of the houses were the work of great architects and were set in gardens and parks designed and improved by the best-known landscape gardeners of past centuries. The principal rooms contained plasterwork and fittings which were the work of the leading craftsmen of their day. Their furnishings had often been made for the houses, and the pictures that adorned the walls told the history and demonstrated the artistic taste of those who had owned the properties over the generations. The loss of houses in Suffolk mirrored losses throughout the country. Medieval, Tudor, Jacobean, Georgian and Victorian houses disappeared, their contents dispersed and their fabric put ‘under the hammer’. The reasons for individual losses were many but the sociological and economic background in which they occurred was similar. The place of the country house and its owners in English society had changed. The abolition of the ‘rotten boroughs’ by the Reform Act of 1832 and the moves towards a universal male franchise as the nineteenth century progressed reduced the power of landowners in national government.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1070.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPolitical and Economic history of UK and USFrench-language works237,207