MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322730547 · doi:10.1017/9781846159794.006

Assington Hall Destroyed by Fire 1957

2010· other· en· W4322730547 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrbanization and City Planning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstateTown hallArchaeologyGeographyAncient historyHistoryLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ASSINGTON HALL STOOD SOME FOUR MILES SOUTH-EAST OF SUDBURY, south of the road to Colchester, in an estate which by the twentieth century had extended to over 2,000 acres. A mainly Tudor house with later additions, it was one of the few lost country houses of Suffolk to meet its end in a fire that gutted most of the building. From the early years of the fourteenth century to the middle of the sixteenth the manor of Assington was owned by the Corbet family by whom it was sold in 1555/6 to Robert Gurdon of Lavenham. Early in the next century his son, John, married the heiress of the Brampton family's estate at Letton in Norfolk. The Gurdons, who also acquired Grundisburgh Hall near Woodbridge to add to their portfolio of landed interests, were to remain at Assington until shortly before World War II. Legend has it that Assington Hall was built on the site of an old monastery ‘in which priests prayed for the souls of those slain in the battle’ of Assandun. However, the location of that battle is the subject of speculation, also being attributed to Ashdon, near Saffron Walden and to Ashingdon between Chelmsford and Southend near the River Crouch. Originally the village of Assington was centred on the house and the nearby church, but it is believed that in the eighteenth century the village community was moved, probably to improve the Gurdon family's privacy. This clearance of the cottages and other properties near the house left it in a more isolated position in its own parkland. IT IS THOUGHT that the first house on the site was of fourteenthcentury origin when the manor was acquired by the Corbets, but what survived until the fire was mainly a late Tudor timbered house built on the foundations of the earlier house and arranged on three sides of a quadrangle. The entrance front was recased in red brick by John Gurdon in the second decade of the nineteenth century, and it seems likely that the projecting side wings of the original house were pulled down at this time. Subsequent additions included a wing at the rear of the older building. The house that survived into the twentieth century had five gables on the entrance front, the central one having a two-storeyed entrance porch which projected forward and had battlemented turrets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.353
Threshold uncertainty score0.923

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3530.088

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUrbanization and City PlanningFrench-language works237,207