Semi-Supervised Entity Alignment With Global Alignment and Local Information Aggregation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Entity alignment is a vital task in knowledge fusion, which aims to align entities from different knowledge graphs and merge them into one single graph. Existing entity alignment models focus on local features and try to minimize the distance between pairs of pre-aligned entities. Despite their success, these models heavily rely on the number of existing pre-aligned entity pairs and the topology information from the rest large set of unaligned entities is still largely unexplored. To overcome the limitation of existing models, we propose a model, termed Global Alignment and Local Information Aggregation, or GALA. GALA constructs global features for the knowledge graphs to be aligned using entity embeddings. It aligns the entities in the graphs by forcing their global features to match with each other and progressively updating the entity embeddings by aggregating local information from the other network. Empirical studies on commonly-used KG alignment data sets confirm the effectiveness of the proposed model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it