Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Inverse Electromagnetic Problems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have been successfully applied in electromagnetism (EM) for the solution of direct problems. However, since PINNs typically do not take system parameters (like geometry or material properties) as input, when embedded in inverse problems or adopted for parametrical studies, to output the solution of the governing equations, they require additional training for each new system parameter set. To overcome this issue, we propose a hypernetwork (HNN) that receives system parameters and outputs the network weights of a PINN, which in turn provides the solution of the direct problem. Therefore, once trained, the HNN acts as a parametrized real-time field solver that allows the fast solution of inverse problems, in which the objective(s) are defined a posteriori (i.e., after HNN’s training). This method is adopted for a coil optimal design task in magnetostatics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it