MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322731758 · doi:10.1130/b36649.1

Genesis and source affinities of heterogeneous ultramafic rocks in the North Kongling Complex, Yangtze craton: Architecture of a Paleoproterozoic accretionary orogen

2023· article· en· W4322731758 on OpenAlexaff
Hongtao Peng, Hao Deng, Qingsen Han, Songbai Peng, Ali Polat, Timothy Kusky

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society of America Bulletin · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetasomatismGeologyGeochemistryCratonProtolithZirconUltramafic rockMantle (geology)SubductionOlivineArcheanTectonicsPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ultramafic massifs are minor but meaningful components of orogens because they record the mantle properties and the processes of plate generation, subduction, accretion, and collision, thus providing key information about crust-mantle interaction processes and the evolution of orogens. Here, we present an integrated study of field observations, whole-rock and mineral geochemistry, zircon U-Pb ages, and whole-rock Sm-Nd and Re-Os isotopes for serpentinized harzburgites and olivine pyroxenites from the Paleoproterozoic Shuiyuesi mélange belt, North Kongling Complex, to constrain the tectonic evolution of the Yangtze craton, South China. The serpentinized harzburgites are characterized by enrichment of light rare earth elements (LREEs) and negative εNd(t) (−4.3 to −3.9) values, but they have high olivine Mg# (91.7−93.1) and very low Re contents (<0.09 ppb) and negative γOs(t) (−5.1 to −4.0) values. The Archean Re-Os model ages (TRD = 2.82 Ga) of the harzburgites that have the most depleted Re-Os isotope composition represent estimates for the age of the initial melt extraction. Metasomatic zircons from the serpentinized harzburgites yield a weighted average age of ca. 2.04 Ga, which is interpreted to represent the age of metasomatism during a subduction event. These geochemical and isotopic features and geochronologic results suggest that the protolith of the serpentinized harzburgites in the North Kongling Complex originated as fragments of late Mesoarchean (ca. 2.82 Ga) subcontinental lithospheric mantle and experienced melt/fluid metasomatism in a subarc mantle wedge at 2.04 Ga. The olivine pyroxenites are cumulates, and they are characterized by high MgO, Ni, and Cr contents and depleted to slightly enriched LREEs but depletion in high field strength elements (HFSEs). They have positive εNd(t) (+2.0 to +6.6) values and Paleoproterozoic Nd model ages (2.41−2.05 Ga), suggesting that the olivine pyroxenites were derived from a Paleoproterozoic depleted mantle source. Metamorphic zircons from the olivine pyroxenites indicate subsequent metamorphism at 2.0 Ga, in response to a collision. The olivine pyroxenites together with the metabasites in the Shuiyuesi mélange belt represent the dismembered fragments of oceanic lithosphere that formed in a suprasubduction zone during the Paleoproterozoic. Combined with the Archean and Paleoproterozoic rocks in the North Kongling Complex, it appears that the Mesoarchean subcontinental lithospheric mantle peridotites and Paleoproterozoic ophiolitic rocks were simultaneously accreted during a Paleoproterozoic orogenic event. We further propose that a subduction channel may have played an important role in the architecture of the accretionary orogen, in which both oceanic lithospheric materials and subcontinental lithospheric mantle wedge materials would have been simultaneously scraped off and accreted during slab subduction-accretion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society of America BulletinSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207