Entropy-based artificial dissipation as a corrective mechanism for numerical stability in convective heat transfer
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents an entropy-based corrective mechanism to improve nonlinear stability of computational algorithms in numerical heat transfer. The approach uses the transport form of the entropy production equation to calculate a parameter called the entropy-based artificial viscosity. A diffusion coefficient in the momentum conservation equations was modified based on the entropy-based artificial viscosity formulation. The corrective mechanism with an entropy-based artificial viscosity aims to utilize the Second Law as a stabilizing influence on erroneous numerical computations and enhance numerical stability and accuracy. Negative values of numerical entropy production due to discretization errors normally lead to physically unrealistic results that violate the numerical form of the Second Law. The algorithm uses these negative values as a predictive indicator to reduce numerical error and ensure closer compliance with the Second Law. The results for natural convection within a cavity indicate that the entropy-based artificial dissipation can significantly reduce the erroneous values of numerical entropy production and predicted velocities and temperatures, thereby improving the numerical accuracy and stability of the formulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it