Bibliographic record
Abstract
Дисфагия - расстройство акта глотания, препятствующее продвижению жидкости, твердой пищи или одновременно и того и другого от глотки до желудка. Этиология различна: от поражения центральной нервной системы, эозинофильного эзофагита до врожденных анатомических аномалий сосудов. Выделяется две формы: орофарингеальная и эзофагеальная, бывает сочетание обеих форм. В обзоре представлены основные причины развития обеих форм, клиника, современные методы диагностики и лечения. Dysphagia is a swallowing disorder that prevents the passage of liquid, solid food, or both from the pharynx to the stomach. The etiology is different: from damage to the central nervous system, eosinophilic esophagitis to congenital anatomical vascular anomalies. Two forms: oropharyngeal and esophageal, there is a combination of both forms. The review presents the main reasons for the development of both forms, clinic, modern methods of diagnosis and treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".