‘Going concern’ assumption and ‘liquidation’ assumption. The contribution of economia aziendale in historical perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The focus of the paper is on the income orientation (versus capital orientation) that proved to be particularly relevant in Italy during the last one hundred years in conjunction with the monetary equilibrium, an axiom of economia aziendale which helps, still nowadays in times of transmodating dynamics, to face and solve many problems, included ‘on going’ and ‘abandon’ decisions. Furthermore, the aim of research is to draw attention to the large Italian literature, often internationally unknown, hoping it can contribute to the knowledge of accounting history in different Countries and cultures. Throughout one hundred years of economia aziendale it has not been possible to split various periods in which more emphasis is on the assumption of ‘going concern’ or on the assumption of ‘liquidation’, because the different Authors refer systematically and continuously to both hypotheses in a joint economic connection. The ‘going concern’ hypothesis is referred to every ‘economic unit’, azienda in Italian literature. The contemporary overall crisis involves accounting statutory regulations and standard setters, debating prospective conditions of concern continuity, which is the economic, financial, monetary, patrimonial and general synergic equilibrium, as well as the connected social, political, anthropological, environmental, sustainability aspects. The accent is on income flows magnitudes in order to ‘on going’ or ‘wave’ decision. In this way, also ‘money and credit’ dynamics is interpreted in the aspects of income production, the maintaining of ‘monetary equilibrium’, and the control of capital structure. In this regard the income concept, in different configurations, is a fundamental unavoidable construction, especially economic income, which tends to move the determination to decisions and implementing actions, also in most adverse situations, considering in the decision process all the variables which explicitly reflect the azienda, concern, in its unitary, dynamic, continuum system. Hence, the constant control over ‘production conditions’ and also ‘monetary equilibrium’, whose maintenance is through both suitable characteristic production operations and by appropriate financial-monetary operations as well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".