MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322751507 · doi:10.4000/ccm.9559

Anna Bücheler, Ornament as Argument : Textile Pages and Textile Metaphors in Early Medieval Manuscripts

2022· article· fr· W4322751507 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas Rainer

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de civilisation médiévale · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt, Politics, and Modernism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTextileArgument (complex analysis)ArtArt historyHistoryArchaeologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’ouvrage de Anna Bücheler publié en 2019 dans le cadre des Zurich Studies in the History of Art est le fruit de sa thèse de doctorat, soutenu en 2014, à l’Université de Toronto, sous la direction du professeur Adam S. Cohen. Elle traite de deux domaines qui, bien que longtemps considérés comme marginaux et négligés dans la recherche, au moins depuis les années 2000, sont de plus en plus le centre d'intérêt de l'histoire de l'art médiéval : l'ornement et les textiles ou, formulé de manière p...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers de civilisation médiévaleSame topicArt, Politics, and ModernismFrench-language works237,207