MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322756971 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7692809

Matrix-Free Edge-Domain Decomposition Method for Massively Parallel 3-D Finite Element Simulation With Field-Circuit Coupling

2020· article· en· W4322756971 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jiacong Li, Peng Liu, Venkata Dinavshi

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDomain decomposition methodsMassively parallelFinite element methodCoupling (piping)Matrix (chemical analysis)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionComputer scienceField (mathematics)Parallel computingComputational sciencePhysicsMathematicsMaterials sciencePure mathematicsTelecommunicationsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, a novel edge-domain decomposition (EDD) method is proposed to solve 3-D nonlinear finite element (FE) problems of electromagnetic devices and transient field circuit co-simulation. The method applies reduced magnetic vector potential formulation to discretize the physical problem based on 3-D edge elements, and the solution region is divided into many sub-domains that only contain one edge unknown. The solution of lightweight nonlinear sub-domain systems can be massively parallelized, and the neighbor-to-neighbor communication scheme eliminates the need to assemble the global FE matrix. This article also introduces an indirect coupling scheme to handle large eddy currents to interface the EDD FE system with external circuits. The abovementioned algorithms are then implemented on a many-core GPU for transient field circuit co-simulation. The result shows an auto-gauging property, and the comparison with a commercial FE software indicates a speedup of over 43 times with relative error less than 2%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.675
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical MethodsFrench-language works237,207