MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322756989 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7692834

Parallel Finite Element Computation of Time-Varying Ionized Field Around Hybrid AC/DC Lines via Fine-Grained Domain Decomposition

2020· article· en· W4322756989 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Qingjie Xu, Peng Liu, Venkata Dinavahi

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDomain decomposition methodsComputationDecompositionFinite element methodField (mathematics)PhysicsElement (criminal law)Domain (mathematical analysis)Time domainComputational scienceComputational physicsComputer scienceMathematical analysisMathematicsChemistryAlgorithmPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The time-varying hybrid ionized eld around HVAC and HVDC transmission lines is a computationally demanding problem due to the coupling of the Poisson's equation and current continuity equation, as well as the involvement of large matrix in traditional Galerkin nite element method (FEM). In this paper, a fine grained nodal domain decomposition (NDD) scheme, which enables each sub-domain with only one unknown to be solved independently in a massively parallel fashion, was employed to solve the Poisson's equation. Meanwhile, an upwind nodal charge conservation (NCC) method is applied to solve the current continuity equation without numerical oscillation at each finite element nodal level. The computation of NDD and NCC can both be vectorized and mapped to massive computational cores and utilize the computing power of graphics processor units (GPUs). The interaction between HVAC and HVDC was solved without the Deutsch's assumption to guarantee the accuracy, and the wind influence can be considered. With the massively parallel NDD scheme and NCC scheme, both the Poisson's equation and the current continuity equation were solved at each time-step on GPUs to obtain the transient details of the hybrid ionized field. The performance of the proposed method is tested and compared with commercial software, showing a speedup of 17 times for an 8184-node finite element case with a mean relative error of 0.07%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207