MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract P2-03-07: Multi-parametric algorithm integrating on-treatment Ki67 value and standard clinicopathological variables to predict risk of recurrences for women > 70 years old with early ER+HER2- tumours in POETIC trial

2023· article· en· W4322760627 on OpenAlexaff
Maggie C.U. Cheang, Monisha Dewan, Lucy Kilburn, Gabriele Morani, Lila Zabaglo, Kally Sidhu, Holly Tovey, Xixuan Zhu, Chris Holcombe, Anthony Skene, A. Ian Smith, J.F.R. Robertson, Alistair Ring, Nicholas C. Turner, Judith M. Bliss, Mitch Dowsett

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBreast Cancer Treatment Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerInternal medicineExemestaneOverfittingEstrogen receptorOncologyGynecologyCancerAromatase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Prognosis in older patients with breast cancer (BC) is worse compared to younger patients. No robust and specific tool to predict the risk of recurrence (TTR) for women aged 70 and over is likely due to the lack of representation of this group in the data from clinical trials. In the POETIC trial, of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and mainly human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) BC (88%), peri-operative aromatase inhibitor (POAI) did not improve treatment outcome, but patients with low baseline Ki67 value (Ki67B) or low POAI-induced Ki67 value (Ki67_2wk) had good outcome with standard of care therapy (usually adjuvant endocrine therapy (adjET) with the addition of chemotherapy as clinically indicated). In this study, we sought to develop a multi-parametric algorithm, named Ki67Cal, by integrating Ki67_2wk value with tumour characteristics to predict TTR for patients > 70 years old (yr) with early ER+HER2- BC treated with adjET only. Methods: Within POETIC, 39% (n=1744) of the randomised patients (n = 4480) were >70 years old. There were 813 patients aged > 70yr, with ER+HER2- BC, randomised to POAI treatment and treated with adjET only. A power calculation indicated that 811 such patients were sufficient to develop a prediction model that minimized overfitting, allowed up to 8 predictors, for predicting 5-years TTR with a median follow-up of 5.24 years and an overall event rate per 1000 person-years = 0.027, and provided an anticipated performance in terms of model fit R2 = 0.08 (Riley et al. BMJ 2020). A three-fold cross-validation approach was applied; an optimal list of features was selected in the training set (n = 538, events = 70); the agreement between expected and observed outcomes from the algorithm on the validation set (n = 275, events = 37) was evaluated by calibration plot. Multivariable Ridge Cox Regression model of significant parameters was built on the dataset merging training and validation datasets (n = 813) for precise estimates of the coefficients of parameters. A subset of post-POAI samples (n = 99) was gene expression profiled with Nanostring to allow pseudo-Oncotype, pseudo-EndoPredict, and RUO-Prosigna scores calculated (Buus et al. npj Breast cancer 2021). The risk groups classified by the Ki67Cal and gene-expression assays (GEP) were compared. Results: Within this cohort, the 5-year TTR was 34.5% (C.I. 24.9-47.9) for those with a high Ki67_2wk (>=10%) and 12.3% (C.I. 9.1-16.7) in those with a high Ki67B that was suppressed to Ki672wk < 10%. The significant features were Ki67_2wk, sampling type (core vs. excision) at surgery, and pathological variables (tumour size, grade, and nodal status) for the final Ki67Cal algorithm. Stratifying patients into five groups (quintiles) by Ki67Cal identified 60% of patients with TTR of < 5% at 5yrs, and 20% of patients with TTR of > 30% at 5yrs. As an exploratory analysis, the risk groups by Ki67Cal and GEP were compared (Table 1). To date, these assays are optimized to be used on untreated ER+HER2- samples; there were fairly good agreements between the high-risk group defined by Ki67Cal with pseudo-EndoPredict and RUO-Prosigna respectively, and low-risk groups by Ki67Cal with Prosigna probably because Prosigna scores are driven by proliferation score. Conclusion: The relatively poor outcome of patients >70yrs in POETIC emphasizes the need for prognostic tools that identify patients who may be treated with endocrine therapy alone or conversely should be considered for additional therapy. Ki67Cal provides a simple tool that identified very low-risk and high-risk patients in 80% of patients with ER+HER2- BC. Table 1: Comparison of the risk groups defined by Ki67Cal algorithm with the three commonly used gene-expression assays (pseudo-EndoPredict, pseudo-Oncotype and RUO-Prosigna) applied on the post-peri-operative aromatase inhibitor samples. Citation Format: Maggie Chon U Cheang, Monisha Dewan, Lucy Kilburn, Gabriele Morani, Lila Zabaglo, Kally Sidhu, Holly Tovey, Xixuan Zhu, Chris Holcombe, Anthony Skene, Ian Smith, John Robertson, Alistair Ring, Nicholas Turner, Judith Bliss, Mitch Dowsett. Multi-parametric algorithm integrating on-treatment Ki67 value and standard clinicopathological variables to predict risk of recurrences for women > 70 years old with early ER+HER2- tumours in POETIC trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-03-07.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicBreast Cancer Treatment Studies→French-language works237,207→