MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322764356 · doi:10.1117/12.2643299

An iterative Wiener filter for the identification of impulse responses with particular symmetric properties

2023· article· en· W4322764356 on OpenAlexaff
Laura-Maria Dogariu, Jacob Benesty, Constantin Paleologu, Silviu Ciochină

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntisymmetric relationInfinite impulse responseWiener filterFinite impulse responseBilinear interpolationContext (archaeology)Linear filterFilter (signal processing)Impulse responseMathematicsIdentification (biology)System identificationComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Applied mathematicsDigital filterAlgorithmMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysisData modeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent works have focused on the identification of a type of linearly separable systems owning particular intrinsic symmetric/antisymmetric properties. This problem was formulated based on bilinear forms and Kronecker product decomposition. In this paper, we extend this particular symmetric filter in the context of linear system identification, aiming to estimate more general types of impulse responses. The developed solution is formulated as a Wiener filter, by deriving an iterative version exhibiting better performance features, especially in more challenging scenarios (e.g., limited amount of data and/or noisy conditions). Simulation results obtained in the context of echo cancellation indicate the appealing features of the proposed solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207