MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322764356 · doi:10.1117/12.2643299

An iterative Wiener filter for the identification of impulse responses with particular symmetric properties

2023· article· en· W4322764356 on OpenAlexaff
Laura-Maria Dogariu, Jacob Benesty, Constantin Paleologu, Silviu Ciochină

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntisymmetric relationInfinite impulse responseWiener filterFinite impulse responseBilinear interpolationContext (archaeology)Linear filterFilter (signal processing)Impulse responseMathematicsIdentification (biology)System identificationComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Applied mathematicsDigital filterAlgorithmMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysisData modeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent works have focused on the identification of a type of linearly separable systems owning particular intrinsic symmetric/antisymmetric properties. This problem was formulated based on bilinear forms and Kronecker product decomposition. In this paper, we extend this particular symmetric filter in the context of linear system identification, aiming to estimate more general types of impulse responses. The developed solution is formulated as a Wiener filter, by deriving an iterative version exhibiting better performance features, especially in more challenging scenarios (e.g., limited amount of data and/or noisy conditions). Simulation results obtained in the context of echo cancellation indicate the appealing features of the proposed solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207