MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322832277 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.00299

Static Power Consumption Modeling and Measurement of Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces

2023· preprint· en· W4322832277 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jinghe Wang, Wankai Tang, Shi Jin, Xiao Li, Michail Matthaiou

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceEuropean CommissionQueen's UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaQueen's University Belfast
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayComputer scienceEnergy consumptionDynamic demandPower (physics)VaricapEmbedded systemWirelessElectronic circuitEfficient energy useWork (physics)Power consumptionElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsCapacitance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs) are anticipated to transform wireless communication in a way that is both economical and energy efficient. Revealing the practical power consumption characteristics of RISs can provide an essential toolkit for the optimal design of RIS-assisted wireless communication systems and energy efficiency performance evaluation. Based on our previous work that modeled the dynamic power consumption of RISs, we henceforth concentrate more on static power consumption. We first divide the RIS hardware into three basic parts: the FPGA control board, the drive circuits, and the RIS unit cells. The first two parts are mainly to be investigated and the last part has been modeled as the dynamic power consumption in the previous work. In this work, the power consumption of the FPGA control board is regarded as a constant value, however, that of the drive circuit is a variant that is affected by the number of control signals and its self-power consumption characteristics. Therefore, we model the power consumption of the drive circuits of various kinds of RISs, i.e., PIN diode-/Varactor diode-/RF switch-based RIS. Finally, the measurement results and typical value of static power consumption are illustrated and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.179
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.029 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207