MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323027715 · doi:10.22489/cinc.2022.408

Phonocardiographic Murmur Detection by Scattering-Recurrent Networks

2022· article· en· W4323027715 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputing in cardiology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScatteringPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe an automatic detector of phonocardiogram murmurs.Our detector composes the scattering transform (ST) and a long short-term memory (LSTM) network.It is trained on data as part of the Heart Murmur Detection from Phonocardiogram Recordings: The George B. Moody PhysioNet Challenge 2022.The ST captures shortterm temporal ECG modulations while reducing its sampling rate to a few samples per typical heart beat.We pass the output of the ST to a depthwise-separable convolution layer which transforms responses separately for each ST coefficient and then combines resulting values across ST coefficients.At a deeper level, 2 LSTM layers integrate local variations of the input over long time scales.We train in an end-to-end fashion as a classification problem with three murmur classes: present, absent or unknown.Additionally, we use the model to classify clinical outcome as normal or abnormal.These two classifications determine whether clinical followup should occur.Our team "PAWPCG" obtained an official score on the hidden test data of 0.637 for weighted accuracy on murmur classification (rank: 27 of 40 teams) and a clinical outcome cost of 15083 (rank: 32 of 39 teams).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.777

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it