Épistémologie inuit et pistes de réflexion sur le système d’éducation au Nunavik (Note de recherche)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Selon le plan stratégique de la commission scolaire du Nunavik Kativik Ilisarniriliniq (KI), l’éducation doit permettre à l’apprenant inuk de devenir un homme à part entière, c’est-à-dire Inuguiniq. Cet objectif implique que le système d’éducation en place doit promouvoir l’insertion socioprofessionnelle de l’apprenant inuk, et ce, tout en préservant son intégrité culturelle. En s’inspirant du système multiniveau de Kanu (2011), nous proposons différentes pistes de réflexion conceptuelles et pratiques relatives à l’adaptation culturelle du système d’éducation du Nunavik, et ce, grâce à une intégration transversale de l’Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit. Plus précisément, un regard critique est porté sur l’adaptation culturelle des fondements philosophiques et épistémologiques du système d’éducation, des pratiques et des méthodes évaluatives et pédagogiques, du contenu curriculaire ainsi que des objectifs d’apprentissage. À la lumière de notre argumentaire, cette présentation désire proposer des pistes de solution de manière à favoriser l’autonomisation politique et l’autodétermination des Nunavimmiut en matière d’éducation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: yes · About a Canadian topic: yes | Theoretical or conceptual | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: yes · About a Canadian topic: yes | Qualitative | low |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".