MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323031074 · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2023.02.045

Impaired Spirometry and COPD Increase the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease

2023· article· en· W4323031074 on OpenAlexafffund
Suurya Krishnan, Wan C. Tan, Raquel Farias, Shawn D. Aaron, Andrea Benedetti, Kenneth R. Chapman, Paul Hernandez, François Maltais, Denis E. O’Donnell, Don D. Sin, Brandie Walker, Jean Bourbeau, J. Mark FitzGerald, Paul Hernandez, Dany Doiron, Palmina Mancino, Pei Zhi Li, Dennis Jensen, Carolyn J. Baglole, Yvan Fortier, Julia Yang, Jeremy Road, Joe Comeau, Adrian Png, Kyle Johnson, Harvey O. Coxson, Jonathon Leipsic, Cameron Hague, Miranda Kirby, Zhi Song, Christine Lo, Sarah Cheng, Elena Un, Cynthia Fung, Wen Tiang Wang, Liyun Zheng, Faize Faroon, Olga Radivojevic, Sally Chung, Carl Zou, Jacinthe Baril, Laura Labonté, Patricia McClean, Nadeen Audisho, Curtis Dumonceaux, Lisette Machado, Scott Fulton, Kristen Osterling, Denise Wigerius, Kathy Vandemheen, Gay Pratt, Amanda Bergeron, Matthew McNeil, Kate Whelan, Cynthia Brouillard, Darcy D. Marciniuk, Ron Clemens, Janet Baran, Candace Leuschen

Bibliographic record

VenueCHEST Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de QuébecDalhousie UniversityToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of OttawaQueen's UniversitySt. Paul's HospitalOttawa HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéBoehringer Ingelheim CanadaMcGill UniversityReseau canadien de recherche respiratoireCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAstraZeneca CanadaMcGill University Health CentreNovartis
KeywordsSpirometryMedicineCOPDInternal medicineCohortIncidence (geometry)Cohort studyCardiologyDiseasePhysical therapyAsthma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCHEST JournalSame topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchFrench-language works237,207