MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323034586 · doi:10.1002/9781119790686.ch36

Medical Device AI Regulatory Expectations

2023· other· en· W4323034586 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vesna Janic, Helen Simons, Taimoor Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueAI in Clinical Medicine · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood and drug administrationMedical softwareSoftwareEuropean unionAction planAction (physics)Plan (archaeology)Medical deviceComputer scienceEngineering managementSoftware engineeringRisk analysis (engineering)BusinessEngineeringSoftware developmentSoftware qualityManagementBiomedical engineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter focuses on the current guidance, regulatory requirements, and relevant classification rules for medical devices that include software in the European Union, Canada, and the USA. It also provides a summary of the Food and Drug Administration's action plan and best practice guidelines for AI/machine learning–based software as a medical device.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.045
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.090
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.239

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0450.090
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0150.009
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0160.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.329
GPT teacher head0.591
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAI in Clinical MedicineSame topicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationFrench-language works237,207