MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323041772 · doi:10.18280/mmep.100125

Measurement and Prediction of Effect Slenderness Ratios and Aggregate to the Compressive Strength of Concrete by the Core-Drilling Method in Tandem with Machine Learning

2023· article· en· W4323041772 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCore (optical fiber)Compressive strengthDrillingBucklingAggregate (composite)Structural engineeringTandemMaterials scienceComposite materialEngineeringMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The slenderness ratio, length to diameter, of the cylindrical concrete samples of the slab block by the core-drilling method is believed to affect the compressive strength other than the aggregates in the concrete.In this study, the relationship between the compressive strength with mixing and slenderness ratio of cylindrical concrete specimens was investigated by statistics.Further, the discrimination model for mixing cylindrical concrete specimens has been developed by using machine learning algorithms, including support vector machine (SVM), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), k-nearest neighbor (k-NN), and random forest (RF).A total of 180 cylindrical concrete specimens have been measured for compressive strength using UTM.The sample consisted of a mixture of type-A and type-B with a slenderness ratio of 2.48, 2.72, and 3.28, respectively.Samples were obtained by the core-drilling method from slab block concrete.The ANOVA tests showed that the aggregate and slenderness ratio caused a significant difference in the compressive strength of the concrete (p<0.05).This indicates that the type of aggregate mixture in concrete and the slenderness ratio of cylindrical concrete specimens significantly affect the compressive strength of the concrete.The model for discrimination of mixing cylindrical concrete specimens using machine learning algorithms can be used with satisfactory results.LDA is a machine learning algorithm that can show stability in the training and testing stages with accuracy reaching 78% and inconsistency of less than 2.63% (the smallest compared to others).The descending order of machine learning algorithms based on their consistency is LDA > RF > SVM > k-NN.Subsequently, this model can discriminate the aggregate mixture on cylindrical concrete specimens obtained from the core-drilling method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it