← all works
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Assessment of airline industry using a new double-frontier cross-efficiency method based on prospect theory
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.
Post-publication record
- Nature
- Retraction
- Reason
- Author Unresponsive;Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions;Concerns/Issues about Peer Review;Compromised Peer Review;Investigation by Journal/Publisher;Objections by Author(s);Rogue Editor;Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions;
- Date
- 6/1/2024 0:00
- Flagged by OpenAlex?
- Yes
Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement — it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- Annals of Operations Research
- Topic
- Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
- Field
- Decision Sciences
- Canadian institutions
- Concordia University
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- ViewpointsRanking (information retrieval)FrontierData envelopment analysisPairwise comparisonComputer scienceTheory of computationEfficient frontierOperations researchPessimismEconometricsMicroeconomicsManagement scienceEconomicsArtificial intelligenceMathematicsMathematical optimizationAlgorithmPolitical scienceFinancial economicsEpistemology
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no