MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323048534 · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000004826

The Hand Hug: A Novel Test for Linburg–Comstock Syndrome and Wide-awake Correction of the Anomaly

2023· article· en· W4323048534 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas Apard, Anna Duncan, Donald H. Lalonde

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsSaint John Regional HospitalDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThumbIndex fingerMedicineInterphalangeal JointLittle fingerAnatomyTendon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1979, Linburg and Comstock1 described an inability to flex the interphalangeal joint of the thumb without simultaneously flexing the distal interphalangeal joint of the index finger, caused by a congenital anomalous connection between the flexor pollicis longus tendon and the flexor digitorum profundus tendon to the index finger. The “hand hug test” is a novel clinical test for this condition. The palm of the affected hand of the patient is placed on the ipsilateral palm of the examiner’s hand with all the digits lined up in extension. The thumbs are abducted. The patient is asked to bend the thumb around the examiner’s hand while the examiner does the same action—as if the hands are “hugging.” Because the index finger of the patient and the small finger of the examiner are aligned and blocking each other in extension, the thumb of the patient with the Linburg-Comstock anomaly is not able to make a “hand hug.” We report the case of a 20-year-old, right-hand dominant carpentry student who had a complete inability to move his right thumb and right index finger independently. The patient did have the anomaly on the contralateral side, but it was far less pronounced. Specific activities affected by the anomaly were piano, typing, and rock climbing. The phenomenon had always been present but was progressively becoming more pronounced, with no clear history of an inciting traumatic event. We performed a point-of-care ultrasound examination and observed a pathologic band in both the coronal and sagittal view, which was 4 cm in length. We agree that magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography scan can be helpful to characterize the anatomy, but high-frequency ultrasonography is sufficient to localize the congenital band.2 We performed wide-awake surgery with subcutaneous local anesthesia infiltration of 10 mL lidocaine 1% with 10 mg/mL of epinephrine with 20 mL saline buffered with 2 mL 8.3% bicarbonate [wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique].3 The local anesthesia was allowed at least 45 minutes to take effect before the procedure. The patient was positioned supine with the affected limb on an arm board without a tourniquet. The surgical field was prepared and draped using field sterility. A linear incision was made along the radial aspect of the distal forearm over the flexor carpi radialis tendon, just proximal to the volar wrist crease. The anomalous connection was confirmed by the synkinesis of the tendons on both active and passive intraoperative testing. We observed the fibrous type anomalous connection, which is the most common type among the classification of Yurasakpong et al.4 We sharply divided the connection, which immediately corrected the anomaly. The thumb and index finger could now move independently, and the patient was able to make the “hand hug” with the surgeon [See Video (online), which displays the preoperative clinical and ultrasound examination, surgical procedure, and final result with the “hand hug test” for each step]. The patient was mobilized immediately, using principles of hand elevation, early cessation of postoperative analgesics, and “pain-guided healing.” Hand therapy was used to encourage independent tendon gliding. He made a complete recovery and was able to return to normal activities without restrictions. {"href":"Single Video Player","role":"media-player-id","content-type":"play-in-place","position":"float","orientation":"portrait","label":"Video 1.","caption":"This video displays the preoperative clinical and ultrasound examination, surgical procedure and final result with the « hand hug test” for each step.","object-id":[{"pub-id-type":"doi","id":""},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-stream-id","id":"1_pcsm1wze"},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-source","id":"Kaltura"}]} PATIENT CONSENT The patient provided written consent for the use of his image.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenSame topicOrthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207