Abstract P3-07-18: CCTG IND.239: A phase 2 study of combined CFI-400945 and durvalumab in patients with advanced triple negative breast cancer (aTNBC)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract CCTG IND.239: A phase 2 study of combined CFI-400945 and durvalumab in patients with advanced triple negative breast cancer (aTNBC) John Hilton, David W. Cescon, Andrew Robinson, Sukhbinder Dhesy-Thind, Sara Kristina Taylor, Arif Awan, Terry Ng, Moira Rushton, Marie-France Savard, Lindsay Muyot, Marie Claude Reeves, Linda Hagerman, Hongbo Lui, Mark Bray, Dongsheng Tu, Lesley Seymour, Pierre-Olivier Gaudreau Background: CFI-400945 is a selective oral inhibitor of Polo-like Kinase 4 (PLK4), which controls centriole duplication and mitotic progression, and was identified as a drug target based on functional screening of genomically unstable breast cancers. CFI-400945 monotherapy has anti-proliferative activity and enhances antitumor activity when combined with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade in transplantable murine cancer models. Material and methods: In this multi-centre phase II trial of CFI-400945 and durvalumab combination therapy, the primary objective was overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Patients with aTNBC with adequate organ function, PS 0-1, previously treated with >1 line of chemotherapy including anthracycline and/or taxane, were eligible. CFI-400945 32mg monotherapy was administered on a 7-day on, 7-day off schedule for cycle 1 (which reduced the likelihood of significant hematologic toxicity). From cycle 2 onwards, CFI-400945 32mg daily was administered in combination with durvalumab 1500mg IV every 28 days; responses were assessed every 8 weeks. Following trial activation, 3 patients received a CFI-400945 dose of 40mg (same schedule) for a total of 9 cycles before 32mg was declared as the new recommended phase 2 dose (based on other ongoing trials using CFI-400945). A Simon 2-stage design was used; ≥3/15 responses in stage 1 were required to expand to stage 2. Exploratory PD-L1 expression was measured on immune and tumor cells using the SP263 assay. Results: 15 patients received a total of 45 cycles (1-12 cycles per patient). Median age was 56 (31-76); 53% PS1; 20% 3 prior chemotherapy lines and; 27% 4 sites of metastatic disease. Immune vs tumor cell PD-L1 expression was 1% in 50% and 23% of patients, respectively (immune and tumor cell expression was mutually exclusive). Immune vs tumor cell PD-L1 expression was 10% in 17% and 15% of patients, respectively. Grade 3 hematological adverse events (AEs) were lymphopenia (40%), neutropenia (20%), anemia and thrombocytopenia (7% for both). One serious AE at least possibly related to treatment was seen: grade 3 febrile neutropenia. Frequent AEs (˃5%) considered at least possibly related to CFI-400945 were: nausea and anorexia (both 20%), fatigue and dysgeusia (both 13%), headache, dizziness, maculo-papular rash, back pain and gastroesophageal reflux disease (all 7%), Frequent AEs (˃5%) considered at least possibly related to durvalumab were: anorexia (13%), arthritis, fatigue, back pain, pain in extremity and hot flashes (all 7%). No responses were observed in 14 evaluable patients during stage 1, therefore the pre-specified threshold for anti-tumor activity to proceed to stage 2 was not met. Disease control rate (complete response, partial response or stable disease ˃16 weeks in duration) was 7% (1/14). Conclusions: CFI-400945 and durvalumab was well tolerated, with no unexpected toxicities of the combination. However, in this heavily pretreated and PD-L1 unselected TNBC population, no responses were observed and the pre-specified threshold for anti-tumor activity for stage 2 was not met. The trial was closed to accrual on April 26, 2022. Final analysis and correlative analyses are ongoing. Acknowledgements: Coordinated by the CCTG. Funding supported by Astra Zeneca. CFI-400945 provided by Treadwell Therapeutics and durvalumab provided by Astra Zeneca. Citation Format: John Hilton, David W. Cescon, Andrew Robinson, Sukhbinder Dhesy-Thind, Sara Taylor, Arif Awan, Terry L. Ng, Moira Rushton, Marie-France Savard, Lindsay Muyot, Marie Claude Reeves, Linda Hagerman, Hongbo Lui, Mark Bray, Dongsheng Tu, Lesley Seymour, Pierre-Olivier Gaudreau. CCTG IND.239: A phase 2 study of combined CFI-400945 and durvalumab in patients with advanced triple negative breast cancer (aTNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-18.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".