Water in Ion Channels and Pores—Simulation Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The microscopic properties of water in narrow pores are relevant to the function of ion channels and related membrane transport proteins. The emergence of several high-resolution structures allows one to perform molecular dynamics simulation studies of water in such pores. Simulations of bundles of parallel α-helical peptides (e.g. alamethicin) have enabled development of methodologies and concepts appropriate to such investigations. In the narrow channels formed by such bundles, water molecules exhibit reduced rotational and translation motion. This reduction in water mobility may be a general property of narrow pores. We have used simplified channel models to explore the role of hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity in the entry of water into pores. Narrow pores with a hydrophobic lining, although physically open, may not admit water molecules, acting as a ‘hydrophobic gate’ that prevents water and ion permeation. Such a gate can be opened either by widening the pore or making its lining more polar. Simulations have been used to explore the behaviour of water in G1pF, a member of the aquaporin family of water pores, and OmpA, a bacterial outer membrane protein. Preliminary results suggest that a continuous water wire is not formed within the amphipathic G1pF pore. Simulations of OmpA, in which polar residues line the channel, indicate that a small conformational change in one of the channel lining side chains may open the channel. In summary, comparison of the behaviour of water in different narrow transmembrane pores suggests that an amphipathic pore is ideal for water permeation, and that either a highly hydrophobic pore lining or a charged pore-lining region can act as a gate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".