KAJIAN BUDAYA PETUAH JAWA “SAPA SING NANDHUR BAKALE NGUNDHUH” DALAM RUANG LINGKUP HUBUNGAN ORANG TUA DAN ANAK
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Java Petuah Culture Study Sapa Sing Nandhur Bakale Ngundhuh in The Scope of Relationships Parents and Children. This research has the aim of educating the public about the deep meaning that can be taken from the Javanese adage Sapa sing nandhur bakale ngundhuh, as well as taking lessons from the Javanese advice in terms of parents and children. In this study, the data collection method used was interview, observation, and documentation methods. The interview method was used to find out about the perception of the local community in general about the meaning of the Javanese advice Sapa sing nandhur bakale ngundhuh and its manifestation in everyday life that is usually encountered. The method of observation was carried out to strengthen the opinion of the writer and the community on the relationship between Javanese advice and the relationship between parents and children. Meanwhile, the documentation method is used to find out what the previous research's point of view is that discusses the same object as this research. The results of data collection will later be analyzed in a qualitative narrative. Data were collected in Mojotengah village, Sukorejo sub-district, Pasuruan district. Keywords: Javanese advice; parents; children
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it