KAJIAN BUDAYA PETUAH JAWA “SAPA SING NANDHUR BAKALE NGUNDHUH” DALAM RUANG LINGKUP HUBUNGAN ORANG TUA DAN ANAK
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Java Petuah Culture Study Sapa Sing Nandhur Bakale Ngundhuh in The Scope of Relationships Parents and Children. This research has the aim of educating the public about the deep meaning that can be taken from the Javanese adage Sapa sing nandhur bakale ngundhuh, as well as taking lessons from the Javanese advice in terms of parents and children. In this study, the data collection method used was interview, observation, and documentation methods. The interview method was used to find out about the perception of the local community in general about the meaning of the Javanese advice Sapa sing nandhur bakale ngundhuh and its manifestation in everyday life that is usually encountered. The method of observation was carried out to strengthen the opinion of the writer and the community on the relationship between Javanese advice and the relationship between parents and children. Meanwhile, the documentation method is used to find out what the previous research's point of view is that discusses the same object as this research. The results of data collection will later be analyzed in a qualitative narrative. Data were collected in Mojotengah village, Sukorejo sub-district, Pasuruan district. Keywords: Javanese advice; parents; children
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".