Bibliographic record
Abstract
María Zambrano (1904-1991) y la poeta venezolana Reyna Rivas (1922-2011) mantuvieron una relación de amistad y colaboración intelectual durante tres décadas. Varios estudios críticos han señalado el influjo del pensamiento de Zambrano sobre la poesía de Rivas en aspectos como la reflexión sobre la palabra poética, los sueños o el tiempo. Este estudio cifra tal relación en una reflexión compartida sobre la posibilidad de engarzar el impulso de lo naciente (el futuro) con el peso del tiempo (el pasado), que resulta especialmente significativa porque recoge una parte sustancial de las características del registro de escritura que Zambrano identifica como delirio en sus fundamentales «Delirio, esperanza, razón» (1959) y La tumba de Antígona (1967). Con este fin, se analiza el poemario Memorables (1975), de Rivas, para proponer una hipótesis con dos ramas: Memorables es un delirio al modo zambraniano (desvelando así otra faceta del influjo del pensamiento de Zambrano en Rivas y, por extensión, en la poesía venezolana); y, mediante la reflexión sobre el tiempo verbal del ante futuro, desarrolla una solución discursiva a la tensión entre el futuro y el pasado del delirio zambraniano (contribuyendo así a iluminar la obra de Zambrano).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".