MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323064152 · doi:10.24310/tsn.2022.v7i13.16370

María Zambrano y la poesía venezolana: un delirio de Reyna Rivas

2022· article· es· W4323064152 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTSN Transatlantic Studies Network · 2022
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish Philosophy and Literature
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

María Zambrano (1904-1991) y la poeta venezolana Reyna Rivas (1922-2011) mantuvieron una relación de amistad y colaboración intelectual durante tres décadas. Varios estudios críticos han señalado el influjo del pensamiento de Zambrano sobre la poesía de Rivas en aspectos como la reflexión sobre la palabra poética, los sueños o el tiempo. Este estudio cifra tal relación en una reflexión compartida sobre la posibilidad de engarzar el impulso de lo naciente (el futuro) con el peso del tiempo (el pasado), que resulta especialmente significativa porque recoge una parte sustancial de las características del registro de escritura que Zambrano identifica como delirio en sus fundamentales «Delirio, esperanza, razón» (1959) y La tumba de Antígona (1967). Con este fin, se analiza el poemario Memorables (1975), de Rivas, para proponer una hipótesis con dos ramas: Memorables es un delirio al modo zambraniano (desvelando así otra faceta del influjo del pensamiento de Zambrano en Rivas y, por extensión, en la poesía venezolana); y, mediante la reflexión sobre el tiempo verbal del ante futuro, desarrolla una solución discursiva a la tensión entre el futuro y el pasado del delirio zambraniano (contribuyendo así a iluminar la obra de Zambrano).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it