MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323074716 · doi:10.1093/sexmed/qfac021

Case series: expanding diagnostic markers in postorgasmic illness syndrome

2023· article· en· W4323074716 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSexual Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsGF Strong Rehabilitation CentreVancouver General HospitalSt. Paul's HospitalOttawa HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComorbidityMedicinePsychiatryClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Postorgasmic illness syndrome (POIS) is a rare condition in which individuals develop generalized and flu-like symptoms after ejaculation. Several mechanisms and treatments for this disorder have been proposed but many questions remain. Aims: We sought to present a summary of literature to date and highlight common symptoms, associated features, comorbidities, and laboratory findings in a clinical sample of patients with POIS. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 6 patients with POIS in our clinic and presented compiled results. Results: We identified newly described non-flu-like presentations, onset of symptoms with high states of arousal without ejaculation, and presence of psychiatric comorbidity in a majority of patients. We did not identify a postorgasm allergic response with bloodwork available. Conclusion: POIS remains a poorly understood condition that likely comprises a number of different clinical entities. Further research on a larger clinical sample is necessary to better characterize POIS and understand its biological and psychological basis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it