Aberrant frontal lobe “U”-shaped association fibers in first-episode schizophrenia: A 7-Tesla Diffusion Imaging Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Schizophrenia is believed to be a developmental disorder with one hypothesis suggesting that symptoms arise due to abnormal interactions (or disconnectivity) between different brain regions. While some major deep white matter pathways have been extensively studied (e.g. arcuate fasciculus), studies of short-ranged, "U"-shaped tracts have been limited in patients with schizophrenia, in part due to the sheer abundance of tracts present and due to the spatial variations across individuals that defy probabilistic characterization in the absence of reliable templates. In this study, we use diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) to investigate frontal lobe superficial white matter that are present in the majority of study participants, comparing healthy controls and minimally treated patients with first-episode schizophrenia (<3 median days of lifetime treatment). Through group comparisons, 3 out of 63 frontal lobe "U"-shaped tracts were found to demonstrate localized aberrations affecting the microstructural tissue properties (via diffusion tensor metrics) in this early stage of disease. No associations were found in patients between aberrant segments of affected tracts and clinical or cognitive variables. Aberrations in the frontal lobe "U"-shaped tracts in early untreated stages of psychosis occur irrespective of symptom burden, and are distributed across critical functional networks associated with executive function and salience processing. While we limited the investigation to the frontal lobe, a framework has been developed to study such connections in other brain regions, enabling further extensive investigations jointly with the major deep white matter pathways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".