MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323304414 · doi:10.58406/sainteka.v4i1.1143

ANALISIS KINERJA ZONA SELAMAT SEKOLAH (ZoSS) DI KOTA SUMBAWA

2023· article· id· W4323304414 on OpenAlexaff
Ady Purnama, Komang Metty Trisna Negara, Pratiwi Dian Ilfiani, Reza Indriawan Putra Java

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal SainTekA · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEngineering
TopicUrban Transport Systems Analysis
Canadian institutionsSummit Pacific College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pemerintah Indonesia menerapkan suatu program yang diberi nama Zona Selamat Sekolah (ZoSS) sebagai salah satu instrumen untuk mengurangi kecepatan kendaraan serta mengantisipasi perilaku anak sekolah yang tidak bisa direncanakan sehingga memicu kecelakaan lalu lintas. Banyak sekolah di kota-kota besar khususnya kota Sumbawa berada di dekat area jalan raya dengan kesadaran pengemudi yang masih kurang sehingga masih banyak pengemudi yang melaju dengan kecepatan tinggi. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis kinerja ZoSS di kota Sumbawa dan akan di mulai dengan survei kelengkapan ZoSS, geometri jalan, hambatan samping, arus bebas untuk menentukan tingkat pelayanan ruas jalan yang terdapat ZoSS, volume kendaraan, kecepatan/spot speed dan perilaku penyeberang. Analisa data menggunakan pedoman MKJI 1997 dan Statistik Distribusi Normal (Uji Z) yang mangacu pada Peraturan Dirjen HubDat No. SK 3236/AJ 403/DRDJ/2006. Berdasarkan hasil analisis dari kelengkapan fasilitas ZoSS di dua lokasi belum memenuhi standar. Hasil kecepatan/spot speed yang di dapat pada dua lokasi yaitu, jalan Hasanudin sebesar 29,78 km/jam di pagi hari dan 37,49 km/jam di siang hari sedangkan untuk jalan Dr. Wahidins sebesar 33,19 di pagi hari dan 38,95 di siang hari. Kecepatan/spot speed di dua lokasi masih melebihi batas kecepatan yang dimana batas kecepatan untuk tipe ZoSS UD 20 adalah 20 km/jam, sedangkan untuk hasil analisis Uji Z perilaku penyeberang di dua lokasi sudah selamat dan aman dengan tingkat kesalahan 5%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal SainTekASame topicUrban Transport Systems AnalysisFrench-language works237,207