MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323306222 · doi:10.1021/acsanm.2c05483

Photochemical Anchoring of Singly Er<sup>3+</sup> Ion-Doped NaYF<sub>4</sub> Nanoparticles for Scalable Fabrication of Single-Photon Emitting Devices: Implications for Quantum Light Sources in the Telecom Window

2023· article· en· W4323306222 on OpenAlexafffund
Adriaan L. Frencken, Michael Dobinson, Zohreh Sharifi, Elham Hosseini Toodeshki, Reuven Gordon, Frank C. J. M. van Veggel

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Nano Materials · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Information and Cryptography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAnchoringMaterials scienceNanoparticleFabricationPhotochemistryOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scalable methods to access single-photon sources on demand are highly sought after. As a potential strategy, we demonstrate the optical trapping and chemical anchoring of NaYF 4 nanoparticles (NPs) and NaYF 4 NPs doped with on average a single Er 3+ ion. The anchoring method we present involves surface coating the NPs with thiol-functionalized phospholipids, where the thiol group is protected with a chemical group photoremovable at 340 nm 2-bromo-4′-hydroxyacetophenone. Functionalized NPs are trapped optically in a gold double-nanohole aperture using a 980 nm laser. A 340 nm light beam is focused on the particle, resulting in deprotection of the thiol groups and attachment of the thiols to the gold surface, permanently anchoring the NPs. Electron microscopic imaging proves the successful anchoring after removal of the trapping laser, 340 nm light source, and solvent. The approach is promising for reliably fabricating a single-photon emitting material in a scalable and potentially automatable manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Nano MaterialsSame topicQuantum Information and CryptographyFrench-language works237,207