MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323306800 · doi:10.32920/22223317

Introduction: The Role of Indigenous Law in the Privatization of Lands

2023· preprint· en· W4323306800 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Angela Cameron, Sari Graben, Val Napoleón

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousFlourishingParagraphGovernment (linguistics)Private sectorBusinessPolitical sciencePolitical economyEconomyLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[First paragraph]: "There is a move afoot in Canada towards the privatization of Indigenous lands. This move is striking, given the centrality of lands to Indigenous laws and legal orders, as well as to overall economic and social flourishing. But what is privatization? While widely used across many discourses, what is meant by privatization varies. Privatization is often defined as “the transfer of an ongoing business or service from government control and ownership to the private sector.” However, there is no bright line between what is public and what is private, especially when concerning Indigenous peoples and their lands. For our purposes and to set the stage for the chapters that follow, privatization is used here to capture the replacement of services on Indigenous lands and ownership of those lands by governments with individuals or organizations owned and controlled by individuals."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndigenous Peoples' Rights and LawFrench-language works237,207